City Commission Packet 01-23-2001

View the PDF version Google Docs PDF Viewer

                 CITY OF MUSKEGON
                 CITY COMMISSION MEETING
                            JANUARY 23, 2001
          CITY COMMISSION                 CHAMBERS@ 5:30             P.M.


                                      AGENDA

•   CALL TO ORDER:
•   PRAYER:
•   PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
•   ROLL CALL:
•   HONORS AND AWARDS:
•   PRESENTATIONS:
•   CONSENT AGENDA:
                 a. Approval of Minutes. CITY CLERK
                 b. Community Relation Committee 2001 Appointments. COMMUNITY
                    RELATIONS COMMITTEE
                 c. Request to Dissolve a Planned Unit Development for 1050 West
                    Western Avenue (Waterfront Centre). PLANNING & ECONOMIC
                    DEVELOPMENT
                 d. Alley Vacation in Jeannof Court, Block 2. PLANNING & ECONOMIC
                    DEVELOPMENT
                 e.   2001 Wafer Treatment Chemical Bids. WATER FILTRATION
                 f.   DNR Agreement for Engineering Study, LEISURE SERVICES
                 g. Port City Princess. LEISURE SERVICES
                 h. Fertilizer Bids. LEISURE SERVICES
                 i.   Resolution for Charitable Gaming License (Muskegon Yacht Club).
                      CITY CLERK
•   PUBLIC HEARINGS:
                 a. Special Assessment District Barclay Street. ENGINEERING
                 b. Special Assessment District Sherman Blvd. ENGINEERING
•   COMMUNICATIONS:
•   CITY MANAGER'S REPORT:
•   UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
                       a. Request for Resolution for Gaming License (Muskegon Connection
                          Golf Club). CITY CLERK
•   NEW BUSINESS:
                       a. Charter Parks. LEISURE SERVICE
                       b. Parking Lease -               West Michigan Dock & Market Corp. CITY
                           MANAGER
                       c. Arena Contract. LEISURE SERVICES
                      d. Arena Maintenance. LEISURE SERVICES
                      e. Community Center RFP. LEISURE SERVICES
                      f.   2001 Police Cruiser Purchase. PUBLIC WORKS
                      g. Plow Truck Chassis. PUBLIC WORKS
                       h. Fair       Housing          Impediment              Study.              COMMUNITY   AND
                           NEIGHBORHOOD SERVICES
                      i.   Housing Commission Appointments. CITY MANAGER
•   ANY OTHER BUSINESS:
•   PUBLIC PARTICIPATION:
•   CLOSED SESSION:
•   Reminder: Individuals who would like to address the City Commission shall do the following:
•   Be recognized by the Chair.
•   Step forward to the microphone.
•   State name and address.
•   limit of 3 minutes to address the Commission.
•   {Speaker representing a group may be allowed 10 minutes if previously registered with City Clerk.)
•   ADJOURNMENT:
ADA POLICY: THE CITY OF MUSKEGON WILL PROVIDE NECESSARY AUXILIARY AIDS AND SERVICES TO INDIVIDUALS WHO WANT TO
ATTEND THE MEETING UPON TWENTY FOUR HOUR NOTICE TO THE CITY OF MUSKEGON. PLEASE CONTACT GAIL A. KUNDINGER,
CITY CLERK, 933 TERRACE STREET, MUSM] 49440 OR BY CALLING (231) 724-6705 OR TDD: (231) 724-4172.
                Commission Meeting Date: January 23, 2001




Date:        January 3, 2001
To:           Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From:        Planning & Economic Developmen( 0
RE:          Request to Dissolve a Planned Unit Development for 1050 W.
             Western Ave. (Waterfront Centre)


SUMMARY OF REQUEST:

Request to dissolve the Planned Unit Development (PUD) previously granted for a
mixed-use development at 1050 W . Western Ave. (Waterfront Centre).

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

None

BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:

None

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends approval of the request.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

The Planning Commission recommended approval of the request.     The vote was
unanimous.




1/3/2001
                                    Staff Report [EXCERPT]
                                     CITY OF MUSKEGON
                                   PLANNING COMMISSION
                                     REGULAR MEETING

                                        December 13, 2000



Hearing; Case 2000~49: Staff-initiated request to dissolve the Planned Unit
Development previously granted to the Waterfront Centre for a mixed-use development
at 1050 W. Western Ave.

BACKGROUND
The Waterfront Centre property is currently in foreclosure. As plans for redevelopment of
this property are then, of necessity, on hold, staff is asking to dissolve the Planned Unit
Development which was previously granted for the property. This would give the property a
'clean slate' for any potential new developers who may come forward in the future, and not
hold them to the previously approved site plan for the property.

Staff has received one phone call on this request, from Steve Gawron, President of Nims
Neighborhood Association. Ml'. Gawron had some questions about the reason for dissolving
thePUD.




City of Muskegon Planning Commission - 12/13/00
                                  CITY OF MUSKEGON


                                    RESOLUTION 2001- 7{c)


   RESOLUTION TO DISSOLVE THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PREVIOUSLY
        GRANTED FOR 1050 W. WESTERN AVE. (WATEFFRONT CENTRE)


 WHEREAS, a planned unit development and associated site plan had previously been approved
 for the Waterfront Centre at 1050 W. Western Ave.; and,

 WHEREAS, the project was not able to proceed and the property is currently under foreclosure;
 and,  .

  WHEREAS, proper notice was given by mail and publication and public hearings were held by
  the City Planning Commission and by the City Commission to consider said petition, during
· which all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard in accordance with provisions
  of the Zoning Ordinance and State Law; and

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission and staff have recommended to dissolve the planned unit
development.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the recommendation by staff and the City
Planning Commission be accepted and the planned unit development for 1050 W. Western Ave.
is hereby dissolved

Adopted January 23, 2001 .

        Ayes: Sieradzki, Spataro, Aslakson, Benedict, Nielsen, Schweifler,
              Shepherd
        Nays: None

        Absent: NOne
                                           CERTIFICATE

        The undersigned, being the duly qualified clerk of the City of Muskegon, Muskegon
County, Michigan, does hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of a
resolution adopted by the City Commission ofthe City of Muskegon, at a regular meeting of the
City Commission on the 23rd day of January, 2001, at which meeting a quorum was present and
remained throughout, and that the original of said ordinance is on file in the records of the City
of Muskegon. I further certify that the meeting was conducted and public notice was given
pursuant to and in full compliance with Act No. 267, Public Acts of Michigan of 1976, as
amended, and that minutes were kept and will be or have been made available as required
thereby.                                           j --       ,/ .
DATED:          January 23         2001.           ~      J.. ~~ QAJ
                                                Gail Kundinger, CMC/   AAE(J'
                                                Clerk, City of Muskegon
City of Muskegon
Planning Conmission
Case #2000-49                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           +
                                                                                                                   Muskegon Lake
                             LR
                                                                                                                                                                                                                          *   = Subject Property(ies)
          LR                            I
                                                                                                                                                                                                                          0   = Notioe Area
                                        I



                                        I


                                        I
                                                                                                                                                                            ~                                RM-1 = Low Density Multiple-Family Residential
                                        I   1-2                                                                                                                                                              B-2 = Convenienoe and Comparison Business
                      1-2                                                                                                                                                                                    1-2 = General Industrial


                                     (                        1-2                                                                                                                                            LR = Lakefront Recreation




                                                                                                                                                                      B-2   LR
            LR

                             1-2     ~
                                    I
                                                                                            f.l~    I              It./

                          1-2
                                                                        ''-
                                                                        1




                                                                            ' "                 1-2
                                                                                                    I              I;;;,
                                                                                                                     :ii
                                                                                                                   i~/
                                                                                                                   !!,,___c
                                                                                                                                                        1-2
                                                                                                                                                                                     1'   0   /
                                                                                                                                                                                              I
                                                                                                                                                                                                        \ ,------  -~~-a-~·,
                                                                                                                        ~HIG~Nf\/
                                                                                                                                                                                     I§   ~




  ~
                                                                                  !   I
                                                       RM-1                       //RM-1/                               I     I           !
                                                                                                                                              1 I        I                           I~
                                                                                                I
                                                                                                                        I , RjVl-11                 1 I        1-2
                                   rr-L-,-                i         I                                                  I      1       ,       i    ,I    I                           !
                                   1111           .1
                                                  f
                                                         I~                                     I I            I
                                                                    1
                                                              il
                                                                                                        I


                                                                                                                                  I                                              I
                                   vyA~HJrG~ON V          1                                     I   I   L______J                  I
                                                                                                                                                              1 11
                                                          1                                     I I I          I                                              I II               I                  '    I
  ~   /   /      r------------_                                                                                                   I       '                   , I I              I
                                                                                                                                                                                 I
                                                                                                                                                                                                  , I I ,




      600                                     0                                           600                                                     1200 Feet
                    Commission Meeting Date: January 23, 2001




Date:         January 3, 2001
To:           Honorable Mayor and City Commissioners
From:         Planning & Economic Development              ~
RE:           Alley Vacation in Jeannot Court, Block 2


SUMMARY OF REQUEST:

Request for vacation of the existing east/west alley only in Jeannot Court, Block 2,
bounded by Laketon Ave., Nevada St., Windsor Ave. and Franklin St.

FINANCIAL IMPACT:

None

BUDGET ACTION REQUIRED:

None

STAFF RECOMMENDATION:

Staff recommends vacation of the proposed alley, as described above, with the
condition that all City easement rights be retained.

COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION:

The Planning Commission recommended denial of the request for vacation of the
proposed alley. The vote was:

    Yes (Denial):     Abraham, Mazade, Nielsen, Smith, Sartorius, Coleman, Kleaveland
    No:               Aslakson
    Absent:           Veltkamp




1/3/2001
              --- -    -- -




          ---          ------




                                        lS VOVl\3N




  -i ==~ =-=
C ,_
o E
                                [-_-lTT[]JTJUl IJifIJJ
                                      lS AV7:JlJV8
                                ------~--------------------------
iE',: -== --=--=
-Io~8is--~ ---l r==1- - - -
0 C Cl)
~ C t/J
          ---

          -
              ~
                      ----
                                   CITY OF MUSKEGON

                                     RESOLUTlON 2001 - 7( d)

                        RESOLUTION TO VACATE A PUBLIC ALLEY
                                              (DENIAL)
WHEREAS, a petition has been received to vacate the existing east/west alley only in Jeannot
Court, Block 2, botmded by Laketon Ave., Nevada St., Windsor Ave. and Franld QQmplet" ltvmt 4.Q
            rfj!gl&

                                                     .                                   .                                FOR 8VREAU USE ONLY
 lde,ntifil;"tiw,                                in',
  3-, Th\! «dd,1111• of the r•gl"Hcritd offli;:e iri.Miohigao (a P.O. 1;!:oi; may not be designat•d H the addN:H ~f thia ra9iste.recl office)

        3 l'i \l             C:Dt, 8',.! ,i,, ecr.;;                              s·r.                   MV S/(r" .. (,u ,..._,,                             {'I\ \ ,               <-/ ~~'-1'--l I
                                                                                                  '
  4. Otterib• ,he purpose and aet:tYities of the· coreoratlon during 1he year covered by this report
   7"7:- ff"r)fn.°"t(.. -i-~v{ ·_;.•\{y~!~rn1.en.t ::-f (lt;i)l- ((-11';,•\,'\~l'L,.',,_1 ti,..J1~.f-i!-,-~r;-.f'f'                                                                                        f',\(~(   ,-.-f.s:-\\ . . .        U~b

        ·fi:,.c; 11 -kf s              c~.,...-1..        t 1'.rc\1.\,\•       l."'i::           ; ·.,;.:·\ :'.. 14-c.. 5             il't,,t(          J"ll',,.°r            J ·i~ L (   !i .


   ~-
  Proaldont (R/i,qv111,;!}
                                                         ti.AM!
                                                                                                                              -~                             BUSINESS OR RESIDENCE ADDRESS

            ~ t Ii::_        L\..' qr\ s "~,,;,~                  '.JI.I ~ ':i                  A·r· ~,   \'\L"t   't'    I         ~f,          c, -c.,i-~·,,-...1. t'<.c, f1 , ~'( $,                           111,,                  -f ,, S<       ~'
  So-c«ttlll)' {RequlreO}
            fp--~"\         S. ,,.., ;-'+"•\                ,,l, \I                 ..{., l-t,, {A•,                     f•    ..    ;), .       f,...,' l,c \   j      (,r,\,,ft'                (..::'1,,t,ud r 1     ,-n I             I   ,;,_JCj[i_\l.J
  ·rr,;in,u~r (R.aqu!rGd)
        .'.J" n. A,-.:t , ·-i -< ,                           .'J:.)C i.              1-Lc,,i,                  A-.,.~(_ f::,c ..                           f,, 1,, ~~ '--- t I ,                         rn1               cj '1         4 (.    I
   vice l"fB!l!11              '-I .., -,-,. ·; ,. _
   0)fiji,t.Qf

            (','-.. cl       S·f,/'C\ 1-, "\ll
                                                                  '
                                                                              .;i"           ·;.::..         (<_+[ ../Y,                         ,'Y\ VIS l-e ,,., "'                            i)'\\,         •·H LjLI I
  6. The flllng fee is 510.00. Please mcike your_ c.heck or money order PGYablo to the Stato of Mi~h.igi:m. Thi:i n:port mutt be filed on or before
     October 1, 2000. Return this signed' rllpon·wlth fee to: Mlchlgan Depanmemof Consumer & Industry Services
                                                                                                                              Corporaijon and Land Dev(llopment Bur~au
                                                                                                                              P.O. Box 30481
                                                                                                                              LansinQ, Ml 4.9909~7981
                                                                                                                              (017) ,4Hl400
  S~~ of auihoridld officer o~en~
    ,         1 "-,LA, .-1                 )(r, T,, _.                ·
                                                                              1
                                                                                                                 If;,1,·,;.-w
                                                                                                                         TIUa
                                                                                                                                          ):$     l'lt A(' ,
                                                                                                                                                                             I C/  Poto
                                                                                                                                                                                            C    .~   L1 . (liJ
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   j   Phcme (Optjcnat)

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         -"31-7'$S -1 LJ 1t./
   ~~rriote :space Is needed adi;1Qlr,,aJ paget may l!ieJnclu'C1.ect Oo not atao!e 3fl).1 ttM'lS to te(lort.'i"riis report.is required by .Sect,l(lf1 91·1, Act 162. Pub/lo Acts of 1982, 11s:
   1utiond110. f'sMure ta flle t,hhl r@pQrt moiy re~ult lo lhe a1sao11.1uontrevotatloli ol the ccrporeitlon.
01/18/2001   10:57      5157555915                        MUSKEGON YACHT CLUB                     PAGE   02
     1/16/01      9:41:34                                                                  p,2




     Thi, is to Certify Th~t
                                  THE MUSKEGON YACHT CLUB

     wa, -.121idly worpor11t1d' on JUIJJ 3, 1936, 12s a Michigan nrmprofit corporation,
     and taid corporatio~ is validly in .txl1tin.ce unde,- t.he taws o/ this Sta.te.

     Tht• cBrHftcat, i• issued to, atteiit to the fact th4t the corporatio" i• in gaod standing
     in IMS affi•• au ~I fMs ,date and Is duly authariud to transact busiMS/1 or conduct
     affair• in Michigan and ..for 110 other purpose. It i• in th• usual form, mad• by me
     at the proper officer, and ls entitled to have full faith and credit gi11•n It In e11ery
     court and offioe within the United States,




                                            In testimony whereof, I ha'Je hore,mto set my
                                            hand and affixed the Seal of the D•part01enl,
                                            in the City o/ Lan•ing, this 18th d-            -
                                                                 <19
                                                                                                   1
                                                                                                   ~
                             0


          --
                              r:r::
                              <
                             ID             --

                                      -
                                            --




                   .... C>

                                                           ?'
                                                                --
          =
                                      --           ' '
                                                 •t-' I'
                                                    1111


                                                  :' '~
                                                           '
                                                                 ''

                                                                -k'''
                                                                  '
                                                   '' ''         ''
                                                    '' ''       -t-
                                                    '' ''

                                      -
                                                                 '
                                                     '' ''
                                                      '' ''
                          =
                      -~~~-~-~~--~-..::::::1::~==·
                                                      '~'
                                                  =~-=:-=-              c&IJI,




1116/01                                16                                        flarclayspc.doc
                 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING BY CITY CLERK

STATE OF MICHIGAN         )
                          ) ss
COUNTY OF MUSKEGON)


GAIL A. KUNDINGER, BEING FIRST DULY SWORN, DEPOSES AND SAYS
THAT SHE IS THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGON; THAT AT A
HEARING HELD ON THE 23 RD DAY OF JANUARY, 2001 THE CITY
COMMISSION ADOPTED A RESOLUTION CREATING THE FOLLOWING
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT:

 All parcels abutting Barclay Street 90' north of the north ROW line of Sherman
               Avenue to the south ROW line of Hackley Avenue.

A NOTICE OF THE SAID HEARING WAS DULY PUBLISHED IN THE
MUSKEGON CHRONICLE, A DAILY NEWSPAPER OF GENERAL CIRCULATION
IN THE CITY OF MUSKEGON, ON JANUARY 13, 2001.

DEPONENT FURTHER SAYS THAT THE NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SERVED
UPON EACH OWNER OF OR PARTY IN INTEREST IN PROPERTY TO BE
ASSESSED IN THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT WHOSE NAME APPEARS
UPON THE LAST TAX ASSESSMENT RECORDS OF THE CITY OF MUSKEGON
BY MAILING SUCH NOTICE IN A SEALED ENVELOPE BY FIRST CLASS
UNITED STATES MAIL, WITH POSTAGE PREPAID, ADDRESSED TO EACH
SUCH OWNER OR PARTY IN INTEREST AT THE ADDRESS SHOWN ON SAID
LAST TAX ASSESSMENT RECORDS BY DEPOSITING THEM IN AN OFFICIAL


                                                        o_z=~
UNITED STATES MAIL RECEPTACLE ON THE 12 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2001.


                                          GAIL A. KUNDINGER, CIT CLERK


SUBSCRIBED AND SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS
 clft/f DAYOF ~                  ,2001.

 rv"'~         1if -- .
MfRYP BLIC, MUSKEGON COUNTY, MICHIGAN
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES -~1_-~;?
                             ~ J_-        _0_._
                                              2.___ _
                           ENGINEERING FEASIBILITY STUDY                                             •.
                           BARCLAY, SHERMAN TO HACKLEY

The new construction of Barclay, Sherman to Barclay, see attached location map, was initiated
by the City. The proposed reconstruction of this section of Barclay is necessary due to the    l
conditions of the existing pavement, which has deteriorated to a point where reconstruction is
necessary.

A memorandum from the Assessor's office, which addresses appraisal and benefits to abutting
properties, is attached.

The preliminary cost estimate for the work associated with paving is approximately $600,000
with the length of the project being approximately 2,477 lineal feet or 4,00.3 of assessable front
footage. This translates into an estimated improvement cost of$149.98 per assessable foot. The
assessment figure will be at a cost not to exceed $36.35 per front foot.
MUSKEGON COUNTY
                                                             173 E. APPLE AVE., BUILDING C, MUSKEGON, MICHIGAN 49442
                                                                                                         (231) 724-6386
M                  C       H          G       A       N                                             FAX (231) 724-1129

                                                                                    EQUALIZATION DEPARTMENT
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS

Kenneth J. Hulka, Chair
Bill Gill, Vice Chair
Paul Baade
Douglas Bennett
Nancy G. Frye
Jacob 0. Funkhouser
James J. Kobza
Louis McMurray                                                   January 17, 2001
Clarence Start                            •       •
              Mohammed Al-Shatel, City Engmeer
              City of Muskegon
              933 Terrace Street
              Muskegon, MI 49443

                    '
              Mr.' Al-Shatel:
              In accordance with your request, I have examined the proposed special
              assessment district entailing the reconstruction of Barclay Street between
              Sherman Avenue and Hackley Avenue. The purpose of this analysis is to
              document the reasonableness of this special assessment district by identifying
              and quantifying any accrued benefits. It is subject to the normal governmental
              restrictions of escheat, taxation, police power and eminent domain. The effective
              date is January 17, 2001.
              In conclusion, it is my opinion that the special assessment amounts justly and
              reasonably represents the accrued benefits to the properties encompassed by this
              project. The amounts reflect the sum of the immediate estimated value
              enhancement and the intrinsic value that will accrue from an overall increase in
              property values due to an improved quality of life created by the proposed
              project. As previously presented, the proposed special assessment district
              encompasses a mixture of properties, but the front foot rate of$36.35 appears
              reasonable in light of analysis that indicates a possible enhancement of$37.37.
              The conclusions are based upon the data presented within this limited analysis in
              restricted format, and on supporting information in my files.

              Sincerely,


              b::.~MAE1
              Senior Appraiser


                                 TDD (231) 722-4103 • An EEO I ADA I AA Employer
                                                  recycled paper
'                                    Benefit Analysis for the Barclay Street Reconstruction Project




'I                     :- . -
       TRUE CASH VAJ_UE ($)*
               - .. ,·'
                                 .      .,:':'        .


                          ,,..,,' : ·. ,-·> •. ,,,·.- ' . .   ~
                                                                                      TableB
                                                                      Front Foot Benefit Calculations



                                                                  BENEFIT% B1:1111:fllJ•)* .!:'RO.NT f'OOTAGI"§~        i::~§;£.tRd,rJ~>
                                                                                                                        ;: ~}-~·f·t;:. \j;£;,'.(~{)(\tt::F
I                                                                    4.0%            $183,220                                     37.37


I                                                                      • Aggregate of all properties in the district.


I    However, the topography of parcel numbers 24-036-400-0014-00 and 24-036-400-0016-00
     severely inhibits complete development of these properties. There is a significant amount of
     land area in the ravine parallel to Ruddiman Creek. Therefore, it is recommended that the
I    assessable frontage of these parcels be reduced by 50%. No other adverse or extraordinary
     conqitions were apparent.

I                                                                 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS


I            Generally, a special assessment district will be upheld unless there is a substantial or
     unreasonable disparity between the assessment amount and the value of the land as improved.
     In Dixon Road Group vs City of Novi... 426 Mich 390; 395 NW2d 211 (1996) the court

I    invalidated a special assessment where the assessed value was 2.6 times greater than, "the
     general rule is well settled that the benefits which property will derive from a local
     improvement should be determined by the difference in the market value of the property

I    before and after the making of the improvement" ( Dixon, at 399). The appraiser in Dixon
     presented evidence showing the likely increase in land values, and concluded the assessment
     amount to be 2.6 times greater than the resulting increase ( Dixon, at 395-96). The court was
I    able to rely on competent evidence to determine the proportionality of the assessment to the
     increase, ultimately reaching a conclusion that it was substantially and unreasonably



•I
     disproportionate .

             For example, adding a swimming pool to a property might cost money (both initially
     and during operation); however, the homeowner may receive more money upon resale of the
     property if it has a pool. This is the nature of investments and improvements to realty.
     In determining the validity of a special assessment the issue is whether or not there is a
     reasonable proportionality between the additional value added and the cost imposed. A
I    property owner is probably accurate in concluding that people will not relocate to the special
     assessment district solely because of this improvement. Regardless of motive, a prospective
     purchaser of realty will pay more for enhancements that add value to the land, and less for less
I    valuable land. The type of improvements on land values within the assessment district will
     determine which result will occur.

I
I
     1/16/01                                                                              8                                Barclayspc.doc

I
                                                         MUSKEGON
;\ffi, matiH' .-\dion
231/72-1-6703
F.\.\/722-121-1

.\.,_,,,_,~or
2Jl/72-l-<,70S
F.\.\/726-51/il

     0


  l'IIH'h:r~
(




2J I /72-1-(, 'IIJ
                              January 12, 2001
F.\\.'726-% 17

Ci, ii Sl'n in·
2Jli72-l-<,716
    F.\.\/72-1-4405                                      West ~Uchlgan's Shoreline City

2J ! /7 2-1-(, 705
F.\\/72-1--117,'i

('0111111. ,I.:: 'l'il!h.

    2J1·"'2-l-h~17
    I-' \\:72(,-25111         Parcel Number - - - - - - - -: at                --~-----
    En\!illl'l"rin,g
    2Jll72-l-(,707                              NOTICE OF HEARING ON SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
    F. \.\/7 2 7-<,')11-I

    Finann·
    2JJ,".'2-t-l,'IJ
                              Dear Property Owner:
    F \\;72-1-67(,S

    Vin· lh'Jl!.
                              The Muskegon City Commission is considering whether or not to create a special
    2J I .'72-1-67')2         assessment district which would assess your property for the following paving project:
    F.\\/72-l-6'JS5

    lncollll' Ta.\
    2311724-(,770
                                                 Barclay Street, Sherman Avenue to Hackley Avenue.
    F.-\:\/72-1-6768

    Info. sy~tl'ms            The proposed special assessment district will be located as follows:
    2Ji/72-H7-I-I
    F. \\./72 2--13!1 I
                              All parcels abutting Barclay Street 90' north of the north ROW line of Sherman Avenue
    l.l'bun· Sl'n·in·
    231/72-1-670-1
                                                     to the south ROW line of Hackley Avenue.
    F.-\\/72-1-11%

    \l,111,1J!l'r•~ Officl'
                              It is proposed that a portion of the above improvement will be paid by special
    231172-1-672-1            assessment against properties in the aforementioned district. Following are conditions
    F \\.1722-121-1
                              of the proposed special assessment which are important to you.
    \ la~ or's Office
    2J1172-l-67HI
    F \\/722-L!I-I                                                    Public Hearings

                              An initial public hearing to consider the creation of a special assessment district will be
    2Jl 1 72-l-h715
    I· \_\('2h-25UJ           held at the City of Muskegon City Commission Chambers on January 23, 2001 at 5:30
    l'!nnnin\!1 Zoninl!
                              P.M. You are encouraged to appear at this hearing, either in person, by agent or in
    23 l .'7 2-1-(, 7112      writing to express your opinion, approval, or objection concerning the proposed special
    F.\\172-1-/,'iNSE CARD
                                                            ,,, . .-.'          ...    .

                                          To have youf\i~te count, pl~ase •

                         Return This Card By: January 23, 2001
    Project Title:                 Barclay Street, Sherman Avenue to Hackley Avenue.
    Project Description: All parcels abutting Barclay Street 90' north of the north ROW line of
                         Sherman Avenue to the south ROW line of Hackley Avenue.


   !NSTRUCTIOMS
    If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
    the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
    indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
    this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
    return this card by mail, simply fold on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is
    showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing.

    6_;;sessment Information
    Property Address:                                     2297                  BARCLAY ST
    Parcel Number                                         24~83°1-000°0028~10 .··
    MAP Number:                                           24-30-36-402-019
    Assessable Frontage:                                  95        Feet
    Estimated Front Foot Cost:                            $36.35            per Foot
    ESTIMATED TOT AL COST                                 $3,453.25

    Property Description
    VINCE-ANN SUB-DIVISION# 1 LOT 28, EXCEPT THEW 120 FT




                                                 Your vote COUNTS!

    Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.

                             j2],·
                                 .'·
Owner
       I AM IN FAVOR

               ! H. .\.
                   f)
           -,--..it)·
Signatu/;Z,;, .·
                               v
                            r. .    ,, ..I ·   ,--,   1
                                    K?/r~;:6::,-4&;1 Owner
                   ;zj ..:;L ?:>{; ~1.~%!..- Signature
                                                          1,·   •1'
                                                                                      1AM OPPOSED

                                                                                                           •
Address ~l 11? /        ,{11,f/i   L-iJ.,fL f;;                       Address
                                                                                               r•_,!;._,;•,:;,:_"lc\l.D J;)HN F   13
        Thank you for taking your time to vote on this important issue.
                                                                                               .·o·, l
                                                                                               '.-.-,- 'i


                                       SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
                                 HEARING RESPONSE CARD
                                       To have your vote count, please
                      Return This Card By: January 23, 2001

    Project Title:            Barclay Street, Sherman Avenue to Hackley Avenue.
    Project Description: All parcels abutting Barclay Street 90' north of the north ROW line of
                         Sherman Avenue to the south ROW line of Hackley Avenue.


    !NSTRUCT!ONS

    If you wish to have your written vote included as part of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
    the City Commission for the scheduled public hearing, please return this card by the date
    indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
    this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
    return this card by mail, simply fold on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is
    showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing.

    Assessment Information
    Property Address:                             2330          VINCENT DR
    Parcel Number                                 24-831-000-0030-00
    MAP Number:                                   24-30-36-402-012
    Assessable Frontage:                          122.65      Feet
    Estimated Front Foot Cost:                    $36.35      per Foot
    ESTIMATED TOTAL COST                          $4,458.33
    Property Description
   VINCE-ANN SUB-DIVISION # 1 LOT 30




                                           Your vote COUNTS!

    Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.




Owner           •
      1AM IN FAVOR



           -------------                             Owner
                                                                       I AM OPPOSED

                                                                                           ,
Signature _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Signature l.,,,B.!:.:::M.:=::..:...:;:::..!:M~~•~~~:.....~
                                                                                                      1o.. \ ;   \c..,
                                                                                                                    ~G
Address                                              Address         ;2.3.;;,C I)   U'(\,(.u)
                                                                                                                         4
        Thank you for taking your time to vote on this important issue.
                                     SPECIAL ASSESSMENT
                                   HEARING RESPONSE CARD
                                     To have your vote count, please

                      Return This Card By: January 23, 2001
    Project Title:            Barclay Street, Sherman Avenue to Hackley Avenue.
    Project Description: All parcels abutting Barclay Street 90' north of the north ROW line of
                         Sherman Avenue to the south ROW line of Hackley Avenue.


   INSTRUCTIONS
    if yciu wish to have your written vote included as pare of the tabulation of votes forwarded to
    the City Commission for the scheduled public hearir:g, please return this card by the date
    indicated above. To use this response card please indicate whether you Oppose or Favor
    this special assessment project, sign the form and return it to the City Clerk's Office. To
   .return this card by mail, simply fold on the dotted lines so the address on the reverse side is
    showing. Be sure to seal the form with a small piece of tape or staple prior to mailing.

   Assessment Information··
  . P1pperty Address:•·                              4401         'N         HAGKL!=:YAVE
   Parcel Number                                     24-830-000-0023-00
   M.f1P Number:,                                    24-30-36-401-023
   Asses.sable Frontage:                             66.77             Feet
   Estimated Front Foot Cost:                        $36.35            per Foot
   ESTIMATED TOTAL COST                              $2,427.09
   Property Description
   VINCE ANN SUB DIVISION LOT 23




                                          Your vote COUNTS!



   ,. Jl\lVll!')fAVOH
                       ·.

                            •
    Please vote either in favor or opposed to the Special Assessment Street Paving Project.
                                                                         .

                                                                                   ! AfVI OPPOSED                                           ~
                                                                                                                                             .     /


Owner
Signature                              ,_ _ _ _ Signature _._....,.•;.;.•..
                                                                             --  -.--) ,'---~:':'.'. ·,~--•~;--·- .

                                                                                                  ,?        ~-~··-.

                                                                         · ,""·,,....~-"•:;..·---.;;l..:.-,:...
                                                                                                                      ,)



                                                                                                             ·.·.;;·•c..
                                                                                                                           ~:--✓ t-,'

                                                                                                                            /

                                                                                                                      : .'--;;;;;'
                                                                                                                             ;...__ _
                                                                                                                                        /""_S,_.




Address
            -·-------=~=-~ Address                                              • •i r'       '




        Thank you for taking your time to vote en this important issue.
                     H-1312 BARCLAY STREET, SHERMAN TO HACKLEY

          PROPERTY OWNER SPECIAL ASSESSMENT RESPONSE TABULATION

                                                                                                                          total of 19 parcels
                                                                                                        FOR                                OPPOSE
                                                        FEET                    PERCENTAGE          13 24-30-36-402-019        95     1   24-30-36-402-011      100
                                                                                                    18 24-30-36-402-018        95     2   24-30-36-402-008       95
                                                                                                  2300 24-30-36-400-033       250     4   24-30-36-402-012    122.65
TOTAL ASSESSABLE FRONT FOOTAGE                        4000.300 ""*                                                                    7   24-30-36-402-007     72.83
                                                                                                                                     12   24-30-36-400-002    602.85
FRONT FEET OPPOSED                                      1284.25                      32.10%                                          15   24-30-36-402-017    102.15
                                                                                                                                     17   24-30-36-402-013       122
RESPONDING FRONT FEET IN FAVOR                         440.000                        11.00%                                         19   24-30-36-401-028     66.77

NOT RESPONDING - FRONT FEET IN FAVOR                  2276.050                       56.90%

TOTAL FRONT FEET IN FAVOR                             2716.050                       67.90%

                                                                                               TOTALS                         440                            1284.25


•-INCLUDES ONLY 50% OF PARCELS 24-30-36-400-031 & 24-30-36-400-004 PER THE ASSESSOR'S RECOMMENDATION




                                                  TABULATED AS OF:   01124/01   10:21 AM

Top of Page


Sign up for City of Muskegon Emails