CITY OF MUSKEGON
HISTORIC DISTRICT COMMISSION
SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES
April 22, 2021
Chairperson S. Radtke called the meeting to order at 4:08 p.m. and roll was taken.
MEMBERS PRESENT: S. Radtke, Muskegon, Michigan; D. Gregersen, Muskegon,
MEMBERS ABSENT: T. Emory, Muskegon, Michigan; K. George, Muskegon, Michigan;
A. Riegler, Muskegon, Michigan
STAFF PRESENT: J. Pesch; C. Cashin; L. Mikesell
OTHERS PRESENT: None
This meeting was a continuation of the April 6th meeting. There were a number of cases under
Other Business on the April 6th meeting agenda which were not addressed due to time constraints.
2021 HDC Goals – At a previous meeting, the HDC discussed goals for preservation in the City
of Muskegon that could be carried out by this board. This meeting began the conversation of
assigning tasks to different board members.
1) Mailings to property owners within the historic districts containing info on HDC
J. Pesch said that mailings will be mostly completed by staff, with help from others
for creating the literature. Mailings could be sent to current occupants and property
owners so both were made aware of the purpose of the historic districts and the role
of the HDC. Staff will also update an informational brochure that can be handed
out to interested parties that come into the Planning Department at City Hall. These
mailings/brochures will include procedures as well as information on what it means
to live in a historic district.
S. Radtke stated that he is willing to work with staff on editing or writing literature
for the mailings and brochure.
2) Outreach to local realtors with literature highlighting benefits of properties in historic
J. Pesch had previously shared some studies on the benefits tied to properties
located in a historic district. The board had also mentioned several other benefits in
the past that could be briefly summed up in a document that is mailed out to
residents and realtors. There have been issues in the past with homes being sold in
the historic district were not presented as such, and new owners then end up
surprised that they have to follow certain procedures.
D. Gregersen volunteered to gather contact names from real estate companies in the
area. He also proposed including photos of a historic home that has been allowed
to make any change they wanted, in turn destroying the architectural value of the
home, alongside a photo of a home that had been respected (likely aided by HDC
review) over the years.
S. Radtke asked how mailings would be funded and whether the HDC should start
producing an annual or semi-annual newsletter that could be sent to the historic
district properties and include HDC cases/updates and success stories. J. Pesch
explained that the cost of the mailings would likely come out of the Planning
Department’s budget and that it would be possible to create an annual report for the
historic districts. Discussion ensued about whether this newsletter should be mailed
or emailed. S. Radtke, D. Gregersen and J. Pesch agreed that the newsletter should
be mailed to attract attention. J. Pesch mentioned also reaching out to neighborhood
associations or attending their meetings to give a presentation and/or answer
questions from neighbors regarding the historic district and the HDC.
J. Pesch mentioned partnering with Lakeshore Museum Center’s Heritage Museum
to promote their Heritage Home plaques, as well as honoring certain home owners
through the City Commission to commend them on the work that they have done
on their house.
S. Radtke mentioned sending letters to realtors when properties in the historic
district went up for sale, if possible. J. Pesch explained that the County handles
transfer of ownership information and it may be difficult to obtain the information
on homes for sale until after the sale takes place. S. Radtke proposed that HDC
create a welcome packet to new property owners instead that could include a printed
copy of the HDC’s local standards and a thank you/informational letter. J. Pesch
mentioned also creating a better online presence where property owners can review
3) Identify resources with particular historic significance to the Muskegon community.
J. Pesch mentioned looking beyond the current historic district boundaries to
identify other historic buildings and sites in the City. He mentioned creating a plan
for including those buildings and sites in a historic district, or another means
recognizing their importance and protecting them.
4) Evaluate other potential boundary updates/new historic districts adjacent to existing
J. Pesch mentioned creating a survey of properties found by during goal #3 and
starting the discussion of possibly adjusting the existing historic district boundaries.
S. Radtke said he could meet with J. Pesch to start assigning tasks to complete these goals. J. Pesch
agreed to draft assignments for review at a future HDC meeting.
J. Pesch said the Planning Department is working on updating the City’s Master Land Use Plan,
which contains a chapter on historic districts. He planned to send out the current Master Plan for
for HDC review and discussion for updating this section of the Plan.
2021 Staff Approval Update – J. Pesch shared a list of projects that staff had approved since the
start of the year:
- 72 E. Grand – Re-roof with like materials
- 421 W. Webster – Replacement of two second-story wood windows on rear of house with
aluminum-clad wood windows fitting the same opening and with the same vertical
- 600 W. Clay – Reroof flat roof, removal of active growing tree and replacement with like
brick and mortar in a 6’-wide by 8’-tall area on the building’s east corner.
- 563 W. Western – Replacement of four wood double-hung windows with vinyl-wrapped
wood double hung windows of the same size and appearance. Repair and replace spalling
face brick and tuck point.
- 263 W. Muskegon – Replacement of rear door and repairs to wood steps on the back of
- 1668 Jefferson – Construction of 78’ of 6’-tall wood privacy fence.
- 1752 Jefferson – Replacement of damaged wood siding with like materials retaining all
exterior trim where possible.
S. Radtke asked that staff inform homeowners that modern mortar now contains Portland Cement
which is harder and can cause bricks to break over time; prior to the 1920s the mortar’s base was
made of lime.
S. Radtke mentioned that, as the chairperson of the HDC, staff will occasionally reach out to him
to ask for advice on whether or not the case should go before the HDC; if anyone had an issue with
the cases mentioned above not going before the HDC could let him and staff know so that they
can collect feedback on this process.
Nelson House – Staff has been working with a group to save the historic Nelson House located at
1292 Jefferson (the former rectory for St. Jean’s Church). The current proposal involves moving
the house from its present location to a vacant lot owned by the City of Muskegon at 382 W.
Muskegon Avenue. Under this plan, the house would be moving from outside a historic district
into the Houston Historic District. No formal review or approval of the proposed project was
handled at the meeting.
The board members shared their opinions about the beauty of the home and agreed that the home
should be saved and/or moved. J. Pesch shared the history of the home and stated that he was
looking for historic photos of the home, especially ones that may exist from when the home was
moved from its original location at the northwest corner of 3rd Street and W. Webster Avenue to
its current location in 1891.
L. Mikesell explained that the City was seeking to partner with the Nelson Neighborhood
Improvement Association (NNIA) to fund the process of moving the house through a loan from
their endowment fund and that a meeting was planned for the following week to discuss the project.
The project would happen in stages with the first involving only the house move and construction
of a new foundation. Depending on whether or not the house had a potential buyer, phase two
could simply allow for the sale of the house to a private owner as-is, or could include an additional
loan to the City for rehabilitating the home before selling it. Any loan would be repaid when the
house sells or over a three-year period.
S. Radtke asked what would happen with the other two structures on the property. J. Pesch said
there are no current plans for those structures with both being owned by the Muskegon Public
School District. L. Mikesell noted that there was a vacant lot on Sanford Street where staff had
been looking into moving the red brick structure from its current location.
HDC Staff Approval of Sheds – Staff is considering updating the HDC Staff Approval Form to
include accessory structures such as sheds. Requests for sheds are fairly common, and are
approved through the Planning Department via issuance of a Development Permit. While the HDC
typically references the Local Design Guidelines for New Construction when reviewing proposed
sheds, more specific guidelines could be adopted and used as a baseline for potential projects in
J. Pesch said that board currently takes quite some time reviewing these typically less-significant
accessory structures and feels that the HDC could develop more specific guidelines that would
allow staff to approve new sheds in historic districts.
S. Radtke would like requirements with fewer restrictions because, as temporary structures, sheds
do not affect the historic timeline of the house, plus it would allow residents to spend less money
on building the structure; these structures should be as neutral as possible and not a focal point.
HDC Regular Meeting Date Change – Due to recurring time constraints with virtual meetings
hosted on the same Zoom account, Staff is considering changing the dates for regular meetings.
J. Pesch suggested that the board move the meeting to a different date and/or time, to avoid
interfering with a meeting that is hosted, using the same City of Muskegon Zoom account, on the
same date as the current HDC meetings at 5:30p.m. Moving the meeting, even if temporarily,
would allow for HDC meetings not to get cut short. J. Pesch planned to return to this topic at the
next meeting when more members were in attendance.
Public Comment Period – Time was allotted for public comment with contact information
provided. No comments were received.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 5:14 p.m.